Краш-тест Mitsubishi Galant
Модельный год: 2004 Год проведения теста: 2006 Организация, проводившая тест: IIHS (США)
Общий рейтинг:
Легенда: |
Mitsubishi Galant ES
Вес: 3,395 lbs.
Комплектация: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ЛОБОВОЙ УДАР СО СМЕЩЕНИЕМ
БОКОВОЙ УДАР
|
ЛОБОВОЙ УДАР СО СМЕЩЕНИЕМ
Mitsubishi Galant was redesigned for the 2004 model year.
Restraints/dummy kinematics Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar. Injury measures Measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the right tibia indicate that injuries to the lower leg would be possible. The dummy's right knee contacted a metal reinforcement under the steering column, which gashed the vinyl 'skin.' Head acceleration from the B-pillar hit was low.
БОКОВОЙ УДАР
The Mitsubishi Galant was redesigned for the 2004 model year. All 2004 and later Galant models manufactured after October 2003 include a rear door structural upgrade to improve occupant protection in side-impact crashes (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). When side airbags are optional, as in this vehicle, the Institute conducts the test without this option. If a manufacturer offering optional side airbags requests the Institute to conduct an additional test of a vehicle with this option and agrees to reimburse the cost of the vehicle, a second test is conducted. Mitsubishi did not request such a test. However, Mitsubishi made side airbags standard in the 2005 model year and the Institute tested the 2005 model. The 2004 and 2005 models are rated separately, except that the structural ratings and rear passenger injury and head protection ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests. Injury measures
Driver - Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity. In addition, loading to
the shoulder was excessive. Serious skull fracture and/or brain injuries also would be possible. Head protection
Driver - The dummy's head was hit by the intruding barrier, producing high head injury measures. |